00747350bbebd0a84c7e3fd504ca5cc74124862c
lrnassar
  Wed Mar 27 10:32:42 2019 -0700
Closing forgotten <tr> anchor for CR ref#23188

diff --git src/hg/htdocs/FAQ/FAQgenes.html src/hg/htdocs/FAQ/FAQgenes.html
index 142b611..2da2b2c 100755
--- src/hg/htdocs/FAQ/FAQgenes.html
+++ src/hg/htdocs/FAQ/FAQgenes.html
@@ -140,30 +140,31 @@
 gene-predictors that use cDNA and EST data. These and similar gene
 tracks are only relevant when you are working on a particular locus where you
 think that the manually curated gene models (Ensembl and RefSeq) have
 errors.</p>
 
 <p>
 To illustrate differences between the most common gene tracks, here is an
 overview of a few different tracks on human (hg38) and how many transcripts
 they contain as of March 2019:
 </p>
 
 <table> 
     <tr> 
       <th nowrap><strong>Track name</strong></th> 
       <th nowrap><strong>Number of transcripts</strong></th> 
+    </tr>
     <tr> 
       <td>Known Gene (Gencode comprehensive V29)</td>
       <td>226,811</td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
       <td>Known Gene (Gencode basic V29)</td>
       <td>112,634</td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
       <td>NCBI RefSeq Predicted Transcripts</td>
       <td>94,389</td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
       <td>UCSC RefSeq (Curated)</td>
       <td>80,694</td>