6827eaab28004c74be351b4bcb4316264dc42b89
galt
  Wed Jun 12 01:41:12 2019 -0700
Small html errors found by htmlCheck

diff --git src/hg/makeDb/trackDb/hiv/vax003PosSel.html src/hg/makeDb/trackDb/hiv/vax003PosSel.html
index c3a401f..182235d 100644
--- src/hg/makeDb/trackDb/hiv/vax003PosSel.html
+++ src/hg/makeDb/trackDb/hiv/vax003PosSel.html
@@ -44,34 +44,36 @@
 test implemented in PAML in the presence of recombination. General conclusions 
 from these analyses indicate that excessive recombination (ρ = 0.01), 
 like usually observed in HIV sequences, can cause false positives in the Bayes 
 test and makes the LRT unrealistic as it often mistakes recombination as 
 evidence for positive selection. The LRT test that compares models M7 and M8 
 seems to be more robust to recombination and the detection of sites under 
 positive selection seems to be less affected by recombination. 
 Nevertheless, a new coalescent model has been recently described that estimates 
 the <i>d</i><sub>N</sub>/<i>d</i><sub>S</sub> ratio in the presence of 
 recombination and hence generates simultaneous estimates of &omega; and &rho; 
 using Bayesian inference (Wilson <em>et al</em>. 2006). 
 Such a model is implemented in omegaMap and has been 
 applied to our subtype and vaccine and placebo samples. We ran omegaMap under 
 a constant model for variation (i.e., all sites are assumed to share common 
 &omega; and &rho;) and the following parameter settings: 
+<UL>
 <LI>N&#176; orders = 10</LI>
 <LI>N&#176; iterations = 10<super>6</super></LI>
 <LI>thinning = 100</LI>
 <LI>priors = improper inverse</LI>
+</UL>
 </P>
 
 <H3>Results</H3>
 <P>
 Selection pressure, as indicated by the <i>d</i><sub>N</sub>/<i>d</i>
 <sub>S</sub> ratio per gene and per site, and the proportion of sites 
 under selection (p) was high for both subtypes, although subtype B 
 showed higher values than subtype AE for both parameters. 
 The Bayesian approach detected numerous sites under selection (n) in 
 both datasets, although up two times more positively selected sites were 
 observed in subtype AE than in subtype B. These differences are probably a 
 consequence of the uneven sample sizes of these two datasets (181 
 and 29 sequences, respectively). Simultaneous estimates of selection 
 and recombination also showed higher <i>d</i><sub>N</sub>/<i>d</i><sub>S</sub>  
 estimates for subtype B than for subtype AE; the recombination rate (&rho;),