03f8972539f5ed48dd9026c8dd95be2764514e3e jnavarr5 Mon Sep 30 08:57:51 2019 -0700 Updating http to https for sacCer3, uiLinks cronjob diff --git src/hg/makeDb/trackDb/sacCer/transRegCode.html src/hg/makeDb/trackDb/sacCer/transRegCode.html index c515c8f..fdde339 100644 --- src/hg/makeDb/trackDb/sacCer/transRegCode.html +++ src/hg/makeDb/trackDb/sacCer/transRegCode.html @@ -1,72 +1,72 @@ <H2>Description</H2> <P>This track shows putative regulatory elements in <I>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</I> that are supported by cross-species evidence (Harbison, Gordon, <EM>et al</EM>., 2004). Harbison, Gordon, <EM>et al</EM>. performed a genome-wide location analysis with 203 known DNA-binding transcriptional regulators (some under multiple environmental conditions) and identified 11,000 high-confidence interactions between regulators and promoter regions. They then compiled a compendium of motifs for 102 transcriptional regulators based on a combination of their experimental results, cross-species conservation data for four species of yeast and motifs from the literature. Finally, they mapped these motifs to the <I>S. cerevisiae</I> genome. This track shows positions at which these motifs matched the genome with high confidence and at which the matching sequence was well conserved across yeast species. </P> <P>The details page for each putative binding site shows the sequence at that site compared to the position-specific probability matrix for the associated transcriptional regulator (shown as both a table and a graphical logo). It also indicates whether the binding site is supported by experimental (ChIP-chip) results and the number of other yeast species in which it is conserved.</P> <P>See also the "Reg. ChIP-chip" track for additional related information.</P> <H2>Display Conventions</H2> <P>The scoring ranges from 200 to 1000 and is based on the number of lines of evidence that support the motif being active. Each of the two <I>sensu stricto</I> species in which the motif was conserved counts as a line of evidence. If the ChIP-chip data showed good (P ≤ 0.001) evidence of binding to the transcription factor associated with the motif, that counts as two lines of evidence. If the ChIP-chip data showed weaker (P ≤ 0.005) evidence of binding, that counts as just one line of evidence. The following table shows the relationship between lines of evidence and score:<P> <BLOCKQUOTE> <TABLE BGCOLOR="#888888" BORDER="0" CELLSPACING="0" CELLPADDING="1"><TR><TD> <TABLE BORDER="1" BGCOLOR="#FFFEE8" CELLSPACING="0"> <BLOCKQUOTE> <TR><TH>Evidence</TH><TH>Score</TH></TR> <TR><TD>4</TD><TD>1000</TD></TR> <TR><TD>3</TD><TD>500</TD></TR> <TR><TD>2</TD><TD>333</TD></TR> <TR><TD>1</TD><TD>250</TD></TR> <TR><TD>0</TD><TD>200</TD></TR> </BLOCKQUOTE> </TABLE> </TD></TR></TABLE> </BLOCKQUOTE> <H2>Credits</H2> The data for this track was provided by the Young and Fraenkel labs at MIT/Whitehead/Broad. The track was created by Jim Kent. <H2>References</H2> Harbison CT, Gordon DB, Lee TI, Rinaldi NJ, MacIsaac KD, Danford TW, Hannett NM, Tagne JB, Reynolds DB, Yoo J <EM>et al</EM>. <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/nature02800" target=_BLANK>Transcriptional regulatory code of a eukaryotic genome</a>. <em>Nature</em>. 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104. PMID: <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15343339" target="_blank">15343339</a>; PMC: <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3006441/" target="_blank">PMC3006441</a> </p> Supplementary data at <a href="http://younglab.wi.mit.edu/regulatory_code/" target=_BLANK>http://younglab.wi.mit.edu/regulatory_code/</a> and - <a href="http://fraenkel.mit.edu/Harbison/" + <a href="http://younglab.wi.mit.edu/regulatory_code/" target=_BLANK>http://fraenkel.mit.edu/Harbison/</a>. <BR>