1f6c523fc3ae53172f655789b37abc1e702d47d6
jnavarr5
  Thu Feb 25 15:01:27 2021 -0800
Fixing phyloP typo, refs #18492

diff --git src/hg/makeDb/trackDb/human/caddSuper.html src/hg/makeDb/trackDb/human/caddSuper.html
index 28c1f1b..4913960 100644
--- src/hg/makeDb/trackDb/human/caddSuper.html
+++ src/hg/makeDb/trackDb/human/caddSuper.html
@@ -1,25 +1,25 @@
 <h2>Description</h2>
 
 <p> This track collection shows <a href="https://cadd.gs.washington.edu/"
 target="_blank">Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion</a> scores.
 CADD is a tool for scoring the deleteriousness of single nucleotide variants as
 well as insertion/deletions variants in the human genome.</p>
 
 <p>
 Some mutation annotations
-tend to exploit a single information type (e.g. phastCons or phylP for
+tend to exploit a single information type (e.g. phastCons or phyloP for
 conservation) and/or are restricted in scope (e.g. to missense changes). Thus,
 a broadly applicable metric that objectively weights and integrates diverse
 information is needed.  Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion (CADD) is a
 framework that integrates multiple annotations into one metric by contrasting
 variants that survived natural selection with simulated mutations.
 </p>
 
 <p>
 CADD scores strongly correlate with allelic diversity, pathogenicity of both
 coding and non-coding variants, and experimentally measured regulatory effects,
 and also highly rank causal variants within individual genome sequences.
 Finally, CADD scores of complex trait-associated variants from genome-wide
 association studies (GWAS) are significantly higher than matched controls and
 correlate with study sample size, likely reflecting the increased accuracy of
 larger GWAS.