80def04a3a6e24537a0669ecc0d61b189457bd62 max Thu Sep 29 05:29:54 2022 -0700 adding UK Biobank depletion rank score track, refs #30070 diff --git src/hg/makeDb/trackDb/human/constraintSuper.html src/hg/makeDb/trackDb/human/constraintSuper.html index 25e20af..6c7688b 100644 --- src/hg/makeDb/trackDb/human/constraintSuper.html +++ src/hg/makeDb/trackDb/human/constraintSuper.html @@ -1,77 +1,98 @@

Description

The "Constraint scores" container track includes several subtracks showing the results of constraint prediction algorithms. These try to find regions of negative selection, where variations likely have functional impact. The algorithms do not use multi-species alignments to derive evolutionary constraint, but use primarily human variation, usually from variants collected by gnomAD (see the gnomAD V2 or V3 tracks on hg19 and hg38) or TOPMED (contained in our dbSNP -tracks and available as a filter). +tracks and available as a filter). One of the subtracks is based on UK Biobank +variants, which are not available publicly, so we have no track with the raw data. +The number of human genomes that are used as the input for these scores are +76k, 53k and 110k for gnomAD, TOPMED and UK Biobank, respectively.

Note that another important constraint score, gnomAD -constraint, is not part of this container but can be found in the hg38 gnomAD +constraint, is not part of this container track but can be found in the hg38 gnomAD track.

The algorithms included in this track are:
  1. JARVIS - "Junk" Annotation genome-wide Residual Variation Intolerance Score: JARVIS scores were created by first scanning the entire genome with a sliding-window approach (using a 1-nucleotide step), recording the number of all TOPMED variants and common variants, irrespective of their predicted effect, within each window, to eventually calculate a single-nucleotide resolution genome-wide residual variation intolerance score (gwRVIS). That score, gwRVIS was then combined with primary genomic sequence context, and additional genomic annotations with a multi-module deep learning framework to infer pathogenicity of noncoding regions that still remains naive to existing phylogenetic conservation metrics. The higher the score, the more deleterious - the prediction. + the prediction. This score covers the entire genome, except the gaps.
  2. HMC - Homologous Missense Constraint: Homologous Missense Constraint (HMC) is a amino acid level measure of genetic intolerance of missense variants within human populations. For all assessable amino-acid positions in Pfam domains, the number of missense substitutions directly observed in gnomAD (Observed) was counted and compared to the expected value under a neutral evolution model (Expected). The upper limit of a 95% confidence interval for the Observed/Expected ratio is defined as the HMC score. Missense variants disrupting the amino-acid positions with HMC<0.8 are predicted to be - likely deleterious. + likely deleterious. This score only covers PFAM domains within coding regions.
  3. MetaDome - Tolerance Landscape Score (hg19 only): MetaDome Tolerance Landscape scores are computed as a missense over synonymous variant count ratio, which is calculated in a sliding window (with a size of 21 - codons/residues) manner to provide + codons/residues) to provide a per-position indication of regional tolerance to missense variation. The - variants are based on gnomAD and corrected for codon composition. Scores - <0.7 are considered intolerant. + variant database was gnomAD and the score corrected for codon composition. Scores + <0.7 are considered intolerant. This score covers only coding regions.
  4. MTR - Missense Tolerance Ratio (hg19 only): Missense Tolerance Ratio (MTR) scores aim to quantify the amount of purifying selection acting specifically on missense variants in a given window of protein-coding sequence. It is estimated across sliding windows of 31 codons (default) and uses observed standing variation data from the WES component of gnomAD / the Exome Aggregation Consortium Database (ExAC), version 2.0. Scores - were computed using Ensembl v95 release. -
+ were computed using Ensembl v95 release. The number of gnomAD 2 exomes used here + is higher than the number of gnomAD 3 samples (125 exoms versus 76k full genomes), + but this score only covers coding regions. + +
  • + UK Biobank depletion rank score (hg38 only): + Halldorsson et al. tabulated the number of UK Biobank variants in each + 500bp window of the genome and compared this number to an expected number + given the heptamer nucleotide composition of the window and the fraction of + heptamers with a sequence variant across the genome and their mutational + classes. A variant depletion score was computed for every overlapping set + of 500-bp windows in the genome with a 50-bp step size. They then assigned + a rank (depletion rank (DR)) from 0 (most depletion) to 100 (least + depletion) for each 500-bp window. Since the windows are overlapping, we + plot the value only in the central 50bp of the 500bp window, following + advice from the author of the score, + Hakon Jonsson, deCODE Genetics. He suggested that the value of the central + window, rather than the worst possible score of all overlapping windows, is + the most informative for a position. This score covers almost the entire genome, + only very few regions were excluded, where the genome sequence had too many gap characters.

    Display Conventions and Configuration

    JARVIS

    JARVIS scores are shown as a signal ("wiggle") track, with one score per genome position. Mousing over the bars displays the exact values. The scores were downloaded and converted to a single bigWig file. Move the mouse over the bars to display the exact values. A horizontal line is shown at the 0.733 value which signifies the 90th percentile.

    See hg19 makeDoc and hg38 makeDoc.

    Interpretation: The authors offer a suggested guideline of > 0.9998 for identifying higher confidence calls and minimizing false positives. In addition to that strict threshold, the following two more relaxed cutoffs can be used to explore additional hits. Note that these @@ -278,15 +299,26 @@ MetaDome: Pathogenicity analysis of genetic variants through aggregation of homologous human protein domains. Hum Mutat. 2019 Aug;40(8):1030-1038. PMID: 31116477; PMC: PMC6772141

    Silk M, Petrovski S, Ascher DB. MTR-Viewer: identifying regions within genes under purifying selection. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Jul 2;47(W1):W121-W126. PMID: 31170280; PMC: PMC6602522

    + +

    +Halldorsson BV, Eggertsson HP, Moore KHS, Hauswedell H, Eiriksson O, Ulfarsson MO, Palsson G, +Hardarson MT, Oddsson A, Jensson BO et al. + + The sequences of 150,119 genomes in the UK Biobank. +Nature. 2022 Jul;607(7920):732-740. +PMID: 35859178; PMC: PMC9329122 +

    +