dd22c78b55e57f9e6495a2a836b241e94d051a5c
gperez2
  Tue Feb 28 10:00:01 2023 -0800
code review edits, refs #30712

diff --git src/hg/htdocs/FAQ/FAQgenes.html src/hg/htdocs/FAQ/FAQgenes.html
index 32a4376..86fad5b 100755
--- src/hg/htdocs/FAQ/FAQgenes.html
+++ src/hg/htdocs/FAQ/FAQgenes.html
@@ -103,31 +103,31 @@
 <p>
 Gene symbols such as BRCA1 are easy to remember but sometimes change and are not
 specific to an organism.  Therefore most databases internally use unique
 identifiers to refer to sequences and some journals require authors to use
 these in manuscripts.</p>
 
 <p>
 The most common accession numbers encountered by users are either from Ensembl,
 GENCODE or RefSeq.  Human Ensembl/GENCODE gene accession numbers start with
 ENSG followed by a number and version number separated by a dot, e.g. 
 &quot;ENSG00000012048.21&quot for latest BRCA1.  Every ENSG-gene has at least
 one transcript assigned to it. The transcript identifiers start with with ENST
 and are likewise followed by a version number, e.g. 
 &quot;ENST00000619216.1&quot;. Additional details on Ensembl IDs can be found
 on the <a target="_blank" 
-href="https://useast.ensembl.org/Help/Faq?id=488">Ensembl FAQ page</a>.</p>
+href="https://www.ensembl.org/Help/Faq?id=488">Ensembl FAQ page</a>.</p>
 
 <p>
 NCBI refers to genes
 with plain numbers, e.g.  672 for BRCA1. Manually curated RefSeq transcript
 identifiers start with NM_ (coding) or NR_ (non-coding), followed by a number and version
 number separated by a dot, e.g. &quot;NR_046018.2&quot;.  If the transcript was
 predicted by the NCBI Gnomon software, the prefix is XM_ but these are rare in human.
 A table of these and other RefSeq prefixes can be
 found on the <a target=_blank
 href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK21091/table/ch18.T.refseq_accession_numbers_and_mole/?report=objectonly">
 NCBI website</a>.
 </p>
 
 <a name="mostCommon"></a>
 <h6>What are the most common gene transcript tracks?</h6>
@@ -298,31 +298,31 @@
 
 <a name="gencode"></a>
 <h6>What is the difference between "GENCODE Comprehensive" and "GENCODE Basic"?</h6>
 <p> 
 The &quot;<a target=_blank href="../cgi-bin/hgTrackUi?db=hg38&g=knownGene">GENCODE</a>&quot; track 
 offers a &quot;basic&quot; gene set, and a &quot;comprehensive&quot; gene set. The 
 &quot;basic&quot; gene set represents a subset of transcripts that GENCODE believes will be 
 useful to the majority of users. The &quot;basic&quot; gene set is defined as follows in the
 <a target=_blank href="https://www.gencodegenes.org/pages/tags.html">GENCODE FAQ</a>:</p>
 <p><i>
 &quot;Identifies a subset of representative transcripts for each gene; prioritises full-length 
 protein coding transcripts over partial or non-protein coding transcripts within the same gene, and 
 intends to highlight those transcripts that will be useful to the majority of users.&quot;</i></p>
 <p>
 A more comprehensive definition can also be found in the <a target=_blank 
-href="https://useast.ensembl.org/info/genome/genebuild/transcript_quality_tags.html#basic">
+href="https://www.ensembl.org/info/genome/genebuild/transcript_quality_tags.html#basic">
 Ensembl FAQ</a>. By default, the track displays only the &quot;basic&quot; set. In order to 
 display the complete 
 &quot;comprehensive&quot; set, the box can be ticked at the top of the <a target=_blank 
 href="../cgi-bin/hgTrackUi?db=hg38&g=knownGene">GENCODE track description page</a>.</p>
 
 <p class='text-center'>
   <img class='text-center' src="../images/ComprehensiveSet.png" 
 alt="Turning on comprehensive gene set" width="750">
 
 <a name="ncbiRefseq"></a>
 <h6>What is the difference between "NCBI RefSeq" and "UCSC RefSeq"?</h6>
 <p>
 RefSeq gene transcripts, unlike GENCODE/Ensembl/UCSC Genes, are sequences that can differ from 
 the genome. They need to be aligned to the genome to create annotations and UCSC
 and NCBI create alignments with different software (BLAT and splign, respectively).