30374e3fc3390902c35bb463510567f1b6f7a96e lrnassar Wed Apr 22 13:44:44 2026 -0700 PrimateAI-3D: clarify origin of the 0.821 threshold per Max. refs #37274 Description previously juxtaposed the paper's 0.821 clinical threshold with the 75/25 benign/pathogenic split in a way that implied the two were related. Per Max on the ticket: the 0.821 threshold comes from Gao et al. 2023 Fig. 5A (calibrated against de novo missense excess in a clinical cohort, n=7,238 pathogenic calls), and the "prediction" column values are Illumina's own calls — not a simple application of the 0.821 threshold (some variants below it are labeled pathogenic and vice versa). diff --git src/hg/makeDb/trackDb/human/primateAi.html src/hg/makeDb/trackDb/human/primateAi.html index efbefed0947..7f4ea570c65 100644 --- src/hg/makeDb/trackDb/human/primateAi.html +++ src/hg/makeDb/trackDb/human/primateAi.html @@ -24,39 +24,46 @@ position sometimes produce the same amino acid change (codon degeneracy), each item is labeled by default with its nucleotide change (e.g. C>T) rather than its amino acid change. The label can be switched to the amino acid change via the "Label fields" control in the Track Settings.

Hovering over a variant shows:

Items can be filtered by prediction (benign/pathogenic), by raw PrimateAI-3D score, or by percentile.

Data Access

Due to the data license, the Table Browser, Data Integrator, and the REST API's getData endpoint are disabled for this track. The source data can be downloaded from the PrimateAI-3D website (requires registration). The primate variant database is available at PrimAD.