b86eab362ce697c350764ffe438ccdba8829e0f3 gperez2 Mon Jul 20 17:37:35 2026 -0700 Fixing the NMDetective-A/B score-range text (0 to 1, not -1 to +1), updating the citation to Lindeboom et al. 2019, and changing viewLimits to -0.3:1.5 on all four NMDetective subtracks. refs #37843 diff --git src/hg/makeDb/trackDb/human/hg38/nmd.html src/hg/makeDb/trackDb/human/hg38/nmd.html index 58e22b0acce..0747c3cea4e 100644 --- src/hg/makeDb/trackDb/human/hg38/nmd.html +++ src/hg/makeDb/trackDb/human/hg38/nmd.html @@ -28,34 +28,39 @@ (Plus Clinical).
Click either of the links to the track details here or above to show the four rules that were used (50 bp, intronless, 100 bp, long exon >400 nt).
Machine-learning predictions of NMD efficiency from +Lindeboom +et al. 2019 (NMDetective-A and NMDetective-B models, trained on Lindeboom -et al. 2016 (A and B models) and from Veiner et al. -(NMDetective-AI, pre-print 2026). Positive scores indicate predicted NMD -triggering; negative scores indicate predicted escape. +et al. 2016) and from Veiner et al. +(NMDetective-AI, pre-print 2026). NMDetective-A and NMDetective-B scores range +from 0 to 1, with values near 1 indicating predicted NMD triggering and values +near 0 indicating predicted escape. NMDetective-AI uses a different scale, +roughly -1.1 to +1.5, with higher values indicating triggering and lower +values indicating escape.