30374e3fc3390902c35bb463510567f1b6f7a96e
lrnassar
Wed Apr 22 13:44:44 2026 -0700
PrimateAI-3D: clarify origin of the 0.821 threshold per Max. refs #37274
Description previously juxtaposed the paper's 0.821 clinical threshold
with the 75/25 benign/pathogenic split in a way that implied the two
were related. Per Max on the ticket: the 0.821 threshold comes from
Gao et al. 2023 Fig. 5A (calibrated against de novo missense excess
in a clinical cohort, n=7,238 pathogenic calls), and the "prediction"
column values are Illumina's own calls — not a simple application of
the 0.821 threshold (some variants below it are labeled pathogenic and
vice versa).
diff --git src/hg/makeDb/trackDb/human/primateAi.html src/hg/makeDb/trackDb/human/primateAi.html
index efbefed0947..7f4ea570c65 100644
--- src/hg/makeDb/trackDb/human/primateAi.html
+++ src/hg/makeDb/trackDb/human/primateAi.html
@@ -24,39 +24,46 @@
position sometimes produce the same amino acid change (codon degeneracy),
each item is labeled by default with its nucleotide change (e.g. C>T)
rather than its amino acid change. The label can be switched to the amino acid
change via the "Label fields" control in the Track Settings.
Hovering over a variant shows:
Items can be filtered by prediction (benign/pathogenic), by raw PrimateAI-3D score, or by percentile.
Due to the data license, the Table Browser, Data Integrator, and the REST API's
getData endpoint are disabled for this track. The source data can be
downloaded from the
PrimateAI-3D website
(requires registration). The primate variant database is available at
PrimAD.