X-linked neurodevelopmental disorder; a classic loss-of-function nonsense variant.
You can paste the HGVS expression straight into the position box and press Enter.
Read it off the set Load the Clinical SNVs Recommended Track Set: ClinVar, HGMD and LOVD stack the pathogenic evidence at the codon.
Try it, ▶ open the session Paste the HGVS, then open Recommended Track Sets → Clinical SNVs.
Session: s/Max/rett
MECP2 nonsense variant with ClinVar / HGMD / LOVD tracks
-
MAP2K2 — a small missense
+
MAP2K2: a small missense
NM_030662.4(MAP2K2):c.401A>Gp.Tyr134Cys
-
A RASopathy-gene missense change — the everyday coding question.
The SNV Recommended Track Set is on display here.
+
A RASopathy-gene missense change, the everyday coding question.
The SNV Recommended Track Set is on display here.
Lines of evidence ClinVar submitted interpretations & evidence, plus Varaico literature annotations for Y134C, sit together in one view.
Try it, ▶ open the session Read the ClinVar interpretations and the Varaico annotation for Y134C.
-
Example session (variant via Marina Di Stefano, Broad Institute)
+
Variant via Marina Di Stefano, Broad Institute
MAP2K2 Y134C missense with SNV Recommended Track Set
Read the annotation carefully
when a coding call isn't what it seems
-
TCF4 — but do you trust this exon?
+
TCF4, but do you trust this exon?
p.Ser504Terchr18:55,234,435G>TENST00000635822.2
Gene implicated in a syndromic intellectual disability; this looks like a stop-gain.
But the exon is coding only in one transcript, and it is not conserved across vertebrates.
-
The catch If the exon is not a real coding region, the “nonsense” call collapses — the variant is most likely benign. Always check the transcript and conservation.
+
The catch If the exon is not a real coding region, the “nonsense” call collapses, and the variant is most likely benign. Always check the transcript and conservation.
Try it, ▶ open the session Compare transcripts; read the 100-vertebrate conservation over this exon.
Case: Irina Giurgea, Hôpital Trousseau
TCF4 apparent stop-gain in a non-conserved, transcript-specific exon
Splicing
synonymous and deep-intronic variants that still break splicing
Homozygous deletion upstream of POU1F1, a pituitary transcription factor (pituitary hormone deficiency).
No coding sequence is touched — the evidence is regulatory.
+
Homozygous deletion upstream of POU1F1, a pituitary transcription factor (pituitary hormone deficiency).
No coding sequence is touched, so the evidence is regulatory.
Read the regulation The deletion removes an ENCODE cCRE with a distal-enhancer signature; conservation and GTEx (pituitary +++) support its role.
Try it, ▶ open the session Turn on ENCODE cCREs, 100-vertebrate conservation, and GTEx over the deleted region.
Case: Amselem & Legendre labs, Hôpital Trousseau
POU1F1 upstream deletion overlapping a distal-enhancer cCRE
-
SHH / ZRS — a limb enhancer in an intron of LMBR1
+
SHH / ZRS: a limb enhancer in an intron of LMBR1
Patient chr7:156,791,472C>Tintron 5 of LMBR1 (the ZRS)
The ZRS is a classic long-range enhancer of SHH; variants in it cause limb malformations.
In snakes, a 17 bp ZRS deletion contributed to limb loss (Kvon et al.).
Motif in an enhancer BLAT the snake sequence and Short Match the ETS1 motif; the patient variant sits in a conserved ETS motif inside a distal-enhancer cCRE, with other OMIM-allele patients nearby.
Try it, ▶ open the session Use BLAT / Short Match for the ETS motif; read the cCRE, conservation and OMIM alleles.
Cases: Wieczorek et al. 2009; snake example: Kvon et al.
The ZRS limb enhancer with ETS motif, cCRE and conservation